Persuasive Speech About Stem Cells. Stem Cell Research Pros And Cons Essay.

College or university of Minnesota Summary: For the first time, stem cell researchers at the University of Minnesota have coaxed human embryonic stem cells to create cancer-killing cells in the laboratory, paving the way for future treatments for various types of cancers or tumors.

The research willbe published in the Oct. As part of the immune system, natural killercells normally are present in the blood stream and are play a role indefending the body against infection and against some cancers.

This research suggests it is possible that we could use humanembryonic stem cells as a source for immune cells that could bettertarget and destroy cancer cells and potentially treat infections,”Kaufman added. The results also provided the researchers with a model of how the immune system develops.

Next, the researchers will test whether the human embryonicstem cell-derived natural killer cells can target cancer cells inanimal models. This research was done on two of the federally approvedembryonic stem cell lines. Kaufman said, however, that if the researchwould lead to a treatment for people, new lines would have to bedeveloped.

Note: Content may be edited for style and length. Cite This Page:.

Conclusion Stem cell research is one of the most controversial topics of our day. As you think about writing a persuasive essay, consider the importance of this topic and how emotive it can be to discuss both the arguments for and against.

Any embryonic stem cell research essay needs to carefully weigh up the pros and cons, as well as the ethics involved. In a lot of ways, where you fall on stem cell research will be indicative of what you think about many different topics such as when you feel life begins, the justice and morality of using human cells to cure diseases, and how you interpret your own religious beliefs.

Do you want to persuade people who might be misinformed on the subject, or do you want to sway people to your side with an emotive anecdote? Then go on to set up your thesis statement, which is the single most important sentence in a persuasive essay, and the foundation of everything you will be writing.

Con: Stem cells harvested from foetuses are just not necessary to have the medical research we need to move forward in curing disease and human ailments. Umbilical cord blood, plus research from adult stem cells, provide all the useful information we could require for research.

Moving forward into the body of your essay, it might be relevant to touch on similar debates for comparison, like the one around cloning, or provide a sample of a debate between the two opposing sides. Your argument for or against could probably use some quotes from experts, or perhaps relevant verses from the holy book of your choice.

Take the time to draw up an outline, as this will help you set the structure up. Then move on to call your readers to action. Conclusion examples Pro: Pluripotent stem cells, such as those found in embryonic stem cells, hold the key to so much. Give your children and grandchildren a future by supporting stem cell research today!

Every disease cured due to stem cell research is bought with blood as surely as the research done during the Holocaust was. Write to your representative today!

Tagged in:.

Odds are, you would be in favor of ending the suffering of the thousands of people who currently battle such diseases. These cures and many more are the potential results of embryonic stem cell research. Embryonic stem cells are stem cells isolated from embryos during a specific stage of development known as the blastocyst stage.

These stem cells can renew themselves and reproduce to form all cell types of the body. Research utilizing these stem cells requires the destruction of an embryo, making the practice a point of moral, scientific, religious, and political controversy.

Many argue that the destruction of embryos for research purposes is dishonest centered on the belief that embryos be eligible as forms of existence that are worthy of respect. Those in favor of embryonic come cell study deem such a loss suitable for the long term benefits that this study could have on thousands of lives.

While numerous fights surround this argument, the main point of controversy is definitely the resource of come cells used and the method with which they are acquired.

In this paper, I will establish what come cells are and the difference between embryonic and adult come cells; then I will evaluate the two main fights in the embryonic come cell research debate; and finally, I will analyze the ethics of these arguments to come to the conclusion that embryonic stem cell research is ethical under certain circumstances.

Most stem cells are only capable to differentiate into a solitary type of children cellular material, in any other case known as progeny cellular material. For example, hematopoietic come cellular material are a type of come cellular material that can just type bloodstream cellular material and pores and skin come cellular material can likewise just make pores and skin cells.

These types of stem cells are referred to as adult stem cells or somatic stem cells because they are gathered from patients after birth Devolder 5.

Meanwhile, embryonic stem cells are pluripotent, meaning they have the capacity to produce all cells and tissues of the body Holland 5. Embryonic stem cells, however, only have this pluripotent potential for the particular five-to-seven-day stage of embryonic development known as the blastocyst stage, after which they can only reproduce a single cell type “The Ethics of Embryonic Stem Cell Research” Stem cells, in general, hold great promise for the future of medicine.

Thus far, stem cell-based therapies have been developed to treat illnesses that previously had no cure. One example is bone marrow transplantation to treat leukemia and other blood disorders. The hematopoietic stem cells in bone marrow are injected into a patient who has severely reduced blood cell levels and these stem cells generate new blood cells, restoring the patient’s immune system Devolder 5.

Therapies such as this will continue to be discovered with the support of stem cell research. In addition to the development of revolutionary therapies, stem cell research also provides valuable information about mechanisms regulating cell growth, migration, and differentiation.

Scientists can learn about these processes by studying stem cells that have been stimulated to differentiate into different types of body cells. The discovery of new information about these concepts will allow scientists to better understand early human development and how tissues are maintained throughout life 8.

Embryonic stem cells are particularly valuable not only because of their pluripotent qualities, but also because of their ability to renew themselves. This is done by “divid[ing] asynchronously — at different times — into one differentiated daughter cell1 and one stem cell-like daughter cell.

Other types of stem cells eventually lose the ability to divide, making them less valuable for research purposes. Embryonic stem cells’ ability to be produced in large quantities allows researchers to make progress in regenerative medicine, using these cells to develop new functional cells, tissues, and organs.

The healthy cells are implanted into the patient, serving as treatment to permanently restoration declining organs Holland 5.

The normally lack of treatment for loss of organ function displays the important potential of embryonic come cells. The sources of embryonic come cells are a main point of controversy in the argument regarding embryonic come cell study. Some possible sources for these come cells include embryos produced via in vitro fertilization for either study or reproduction ; five-to-nine-week older embryos or fetuses acquired through elective abortion; and embryos produced through cloning or what is definitely known as somatic cell nuclear transfer Liu 1.

Somatic cell nuclear transfer is definitely the laboratory creation of a viable embryo by implanting a donor nucleus from a body cell into an egg cell. The integrity of obtaining embryonic come cells via these sources can become sketchy and have led to conflicts that I will later on address.

Study utilizing human being embryonic come cell lines offers focused on the potential to generate alternative cells for malfunctioning cells or organs Liu 1.

A specific technique offers been separated to use come cells in order to restoration a damaged cells or organ: “If a damaged cells or organ cannot restoration itself, come cells could become acquired from these different come cell sources [organs and cells from individuals after birth; gametes, cells, and organs from aborted fetuses; inner cell mass of early embryos].

Scientists could then tradition these come cells by creating conditions that enable them to replicate many instances in a petri dish without differentiating. Such a human population of proliferating come cells originating from a solitary parent group of come cells is definitely a come cell collection.

Come cells from this come cell collection could then become coaxed to differentiate in to the desired cell type, and become transferred into the patient so that they can restoration the damaged cells or organ” Devolder 6.

Additional good examples of study attempts include treatment of spinal wire injury, multiple sclerosis, Parkinson’s disease, Alzheimer’s disease, and diabetes. Experts also hope to use specialized cells to replace dysfunctional cells in the mind, spinal wire, pancreas, and additional organs 2.

Federal government funding of embryonic study offers been purely controlled since when Chief executive Clinton declared such study would not become funded by the authorities. Following this executive order, Congress approved the Dickey Modification inprohibiting “federally appropriated funds from becoming used for either the creation of human being embryos for study purposes or for study in which a human being embryo or embryos are ruined, thrown away, or knowingly exposed to risk of injury or death” Liu 2.

Federal government funding of embryonic study offers been purely controlled since when Chief executive Clinton declared such study would not become funded by the authorities. Following this executive order, Congress approved the Dickey Modification inprohibiting “federally appropriated funds from becoming used for either the creation of human being embryos for study purposes or for study in which a human being embryo or embryos are ruined, thrown away, or knowingly exposed to risk of injury or death” Liu 2.

Embryonic research has continued nonetheless by means of alternate funding. InPresident Bush declared that federal funding would be granted to human embryonic research on a restricted basis.

However, these funds were only to be awarded for research on already existing stem cell lines. No funding was to be granted for “the use of stem cell lines produced from newly damaged embryos, the creation of any human embryos for research purposes, or cloning of human embryos for any purposes” The argument over funding for embryonic stem cell research depends greatly on the ethical status of the research.

There are two main quarrels surrounding the ethics of embryonic stem cell research: the research is usually ethical because of the unique potential that embryonic stem cells have to remedy currently untreatable diseases; and the research is usually unethical because it requires the destruction of life in the form of an embryo or baby.

Ultimately, the possible benefits and controversial status of life that an embryo embodies qualify embryonic stem cell research as ethical, as long as the stem cells are obtained in an ethical manner. Quarrels for Embryonic Stem Cell Research In the realm of stem cell research, embryonic and adult stem cells are often compared.

The controversial use of embryonic stem cells is usually supported on the basis of the many advantages that they have over adult stem cells. Embryonic stem cells are easier to obtain; they have a greater cell growth, normally known as proliferation, capacity; and they are more versatile.

Embryonic stem cells are isolated from embryos in the blastocyst stage and the process damages the structure of the embryo to a point from which the embryo can no longer develop.

Because these stem cells are obtained at a point when the inner cell mass is usually concentrated in the embryo, they are more easily obtained than adult stem cells, which are limited in quantity. Another beneficial advantage of embryonic come cellular material can be their capability to exponentially increase easily and increase, grow consistently when cultured in the appropriate circumstances Devolder 9.

Lastly, embryonic come cellular material’ pluripotent quality can be the primary element that distinguishes them from adult come cellular material The capability to differentiate into any cellular type creates higher options for the program of embryonic come cellular material.

Followers of embryonic come cellular study claim that the study can be validated, though it needs the damage of an embryo, because of the potential for developing remedies and avoiding inevitable struggling.

These backers frequently don’t agree with the perception that “a blastocyst — actually one that can be not really incorporated in a woman’s uterus — offers the same honest position as a further-developed human being” Clemmitt Arthur Caplan, teacher of medical integrity at the College or university of Pa, asserts that “an embryo in a dish can be even more like a arranged of guidelines or formula for a home.

It can’t build the home. For the cellular material to develop into a human being becoming needs an interactive procedure in the uterus between the embryo and the mom” Clemmitt Others in favour of the study, such as Heron, a biotechnology business, state that “not really to develop the technology would perform great damage to over million individuals in the United Areas only who are affected by illnesses possibly treatable by the many medical applications of hES [human being Embryonic Come] cellular material” Netherlands One example can be the previously mentioned technique of using embryonic come cellular material to restoration broken cells or internal organs.

The just method to restore mobile function in an body organ can be to actually replace the dropped cellular material and embryonic come cellular material offer the greatest choice for creating these cellular material 3.

Embryonic come cellular material perform also possess some drawbacks that should become regarded as when producing the disagreement for additional support of embryonic come cellular study. Unlike adult come cellular material, embryonic come cellular material possess a higher risk of leading to growth development in the patient’s body after the come cellular material are incorporated.

This can be credited to their higher capabilities for expansion and difference Devolder Embryonic come cell-based therapies also have the risk of immunorejection — being rejected of the come cellular material by the patient’s immune system program. Because embryonic come cellular material are extracted from embryos donated for study after in vitro fertilization treatment, the gun substances on the areas of the cellular material may not really become known by the patient’s body, and as a result may become demolished as the result of a protection system by the body Netherlands This can be a issue that will need a option if embryonic come cellular study can be to become the basis for long term restorative medication.

Disputes against Embryonic Come Cellular Study Presently, the seclusion of embryonic come cellular material needs the damage of an early embryo. Many people keep the perception that a human being embryo offers significant ethical position, and as a result should not really become utilized simply as a means for research.

One position that opponents of embryonic stem cell research assert is what “The Ethics of Embryonic Stem Cell Research” calls the full moral status view This view holds that “the early embryo has the same moral status, that is, the same basic moral rights, claims, or interests as an ordinary adult human being.

Therefore, with full moral status as a human being, an embryo should not be deliberately destroyed for research purposes simply because it is human Devolder The Roman Catholic Church is a strong supporter of this view, opposing stem cell research on the grounds that it is a form of abortion.

Several other groups, including American evangelicals and Orthodox ethicists, consider “blastocysts to have the same status as fully developed human beings” and therefore oppose embryonic stem cell research for this reason.

Beliefs regarding the moral status of an embryo are subjective, and also their own controversial issue, which complicates the task of creating a universal law for the use of embryonic stem cells for research.

Others in opposition, such as Kevin T. Fitzgerald, a Jesuit priest who is a bioethicist and professor of oncology at Georgetown University Medical School, do not consider the moral status of an embryo, but rather assert that Embryos should be protected because they are “that which we all once were” Clemmitt This view is very similar to moral philosopher and professor of philosophy as the University of California at Irvine Philip Nickel’s “Loss of Future Life Problem” in regards to embryonic stem cell research.

The Loss of Future Life Problem holds that it is unethical to take the lives of future humans by destroying embryos for research Tobis This stance stresses the potential of those future lives that will never have the chance to reach fulfillment if destroyed for research.

In a retroactive sense, this can cause us to question “what if the embryo that developed into Albert Einstein was destroyed for embryonic stem cell research? The response to this problem is that the particular blastocysts that are harvested for embryonic stem cell research are taken from 1 embryos that are frozen during in vitro fertilization procedures and never implanted, 2 donated egg cells, and 3 embryos created specifically for the purpose of generating new stem cell lines.

In each of these cases, the embryo at hand does not have a future life in plan and therefore, nothing is lost by using such embryonic stem cells for research.

For embryos created via in vitro fertilization, the researchers using the embryos are not making a decision that results in the loss of a future life.

The future life of said embryo is lost when the decision is made to not implant it. Therefore, the Loss of Future Life Problem is not really a valid objection to analysis using embryonic control cellular material from iced IVF embryos that are by no means incorporated.

Donated egg cellular material can end up being fertilized in a laboratory or through somatic cellular nuclear transfer, a procedure defined previously in this paper. Embryos made particularly for the purpose of adding to control cellular analysis have got no real potential lifestyle to end up being dropped from the minute of understanding.

In both of these situations, the objective of fertilization is normally not really to create a potential adult individual getting, and therefore the Reduction of Potential Lifestyle Issue will not really apply to these resources of embryonic control cellular material.

If fertilization will take place outdoors a woman’s body, by comparison, after that the embryo is normally not really currently on its method toward a upcoming lifestyle, therefore ruining it will not really deprive it of that particular upcoming” Tobis Bottom line As proven by the different justifications in this article, the issue over embryonic control cellular analysis is normally a complex technological, ethical, moral, and politics concern.

Embryonic control cellular material, with their pluripotent potential and self-renewing quality, keep great worth for technological research workers in search of treatments for untreatable illnesses, improvement in regenerative medication, or a better understanding of early individual advancement.

Nevertheless, the moral issue still takes place, “perform the ends justify the means? For example, if a donated egg is normally fertilized in a laboratory with the purpose of getting utilized for potential analysis reasons, the generating analysis is normally for that reason morally validated.

This is normally not really to end up being stated that the lifestyle of an early-stage embryo is normally to end up being used gently. Even more so that our ethical opinion of these embryos is normally different than that of a later-stage unborn child, an baby, or an adult individual getting.


persuasive speech topics


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *